1. Division·
Regular Season - 12·06/21/2026·10:00
Moss
Moss
WDLDW
VS
Sandnes ULF
Sandnes ULF
WLWLW
Season stats1. Division
Moss11matchesULF11matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 1. Division.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
49%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

37%
1398
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1382
50%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

41%
47%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

33%
3.79
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.08

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1111
1.55
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.18
45%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

36%
18%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

9%
36%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

55%
9%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%
9%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

27%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1111
1.82
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.27
91%
Scored > 0.582%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

73%
91%
Over 1.591%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

91%
82%
Over 2.559%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

36%
64%
Over 3.545%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

27%
82%
BTTS64%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%
36%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

9%
18%
Scored Both Halves18%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

18%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1111
2.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.64
9%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1111
36%4/11
Leading at HT27%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

18%2/11
27%3/11
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

36%4/11
36%4/11
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

45%5/11
36%4/11
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

73%8/11
50%2/4
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%2/2
50%2/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 11/1111/111111
10%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
15%
16-30'8%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
15%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
10%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

25%
20%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
30%
76-90+'32%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

33%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 11/1111/111111
36%4/11
Scored First36%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

36%4/11
64%7/11
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

64%7/11
25%1/4
Win when Scoring First63%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%4/4
57%4/7
Win when Conceding First29%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/7
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

32'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

21'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 11/1111/111111
36%4/11
Scored after 75'36%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%4/11
18%2/11
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

27%3/11
100%4/4
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
0%0/11
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

9%1/11

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 11/1111/111111
95%19/20
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%11/12
5%1/20
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%1/12
0%0/20
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/12
0%0/22
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%1/20
0%0/22
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

10%2/20

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 11/1111/111111
71%5/7
Match Cards > 3.569%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

67%6/9
7/119/11
29%2/7
Match Cards > 4.542%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

56%5/9
7/119/11
78%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

85%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeMoss at home · ULF on the road
55
1.60
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.60
40%2/5
Win Rate30%

Share of sampled matches won.

20%1/5
20%1/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

80%4/5
1.60
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.80
1.40
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.20
20%1/5
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%1/5
80%4/5
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%2/5
60%3/5
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%2/5