Virsliga·
Regular Season - 18·06/17/2026·11:00
Tukums
Tukums
DLLLD
2-1
Finished
HT1-1
Auda
Auda
DWWWL
Season statsVirsliga
Tukums17matchesAuda17matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Virsliga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
35%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

63%
1351
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1372
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

66%
25%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

60%
3.43
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.83

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1717
0.82
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.06
12%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

65%
47%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

12%
41%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

24%
6%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%
6%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

6%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1717
1.76
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.94
94%
Scored > 0.594%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

94%
100%
Over 1.594%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

88%
71%
Over 2.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

65%
41%
Over 3.535%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

29%
88%
BTTS76%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

65%
6%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

35%
29%
Scored Both Halves38%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

47%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1717
1.82
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.24
6%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1717
24%4/17
Leading at HT35%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

47%8/17
29%5/17
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

24%4/17
47%8/17
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

29%5/17
71%12/17
HT/FT Same Outcome71%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

71%12/17
50%2/4
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%8/8
25%2/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered33%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

40%2/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 17/1717/171717
9%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

9%
12%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

15%
24%
31-45'24%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

24%
15%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

24%
9%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

9%
32%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 17/1717/171717
47%8/17
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

59%10/17
53%9/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

41%7/17
25%2/8
Win when Scoring First57%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

90%9/10
0%0/9
Win when Conceding First14%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

29%2/7
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

34'
15'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

24'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 17/1717/171717
53%9/17
Scored after 75'44%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

35%6/17
18%3/17
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

29%5/17
50%2/4
Lead Saved after 75'69%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

88%7/8
50%2/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

13%1/8
0%0/17
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/17

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 17/1717/171717
82%28/34
Open-Play Share87%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

91%30/33
3%1/34
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%3/33
15%5/34
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/33
4%1/27
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%1/21
4%1/27
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/21

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 17/1717/171717
85%11/13
Match Cards > 3.592%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%17/17
13/17
54%7/13
Match Cards > 4.571%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

88%15/17
13/17
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

67%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTukums at home · Auda on the road
98
1.11
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.38
22%2/9
Win Rate49%

Share of sampled matches won.

75%6/8
33%3/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

13%1/8
2.11
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.63
1.44
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.13
11%1/9
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%3/8
89%8/9
BTTS76%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%5/8
67%6/9
Over 2.558%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%4/8