Coppa
Unlock Pro Finder stats
ProPremium members get xG, form trends, custom views and full column control on every upcoming match.
- 14-day backtesting
- Unlimited filters
- 80+ stats · 10k+ combos
- Premium sorting
- Custom views
Upcoming Matches
2 matches| Match | OVR | HYPE | LTQ | 1X2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 17 11:00 LIVE FC Energetik-Bgu Minsk1 ML Vitebsk0 | 74%63% | 79%62% | 68%64% | 114.27 X5.20 21.19 |
Jun 17 11:30 LIVE FC Slutsk0 Dinamo Minsk0 | 78%75% | 85%81% | 72%69% | 112.18 X4.51 21.25 |
Recent Results
17 matches| Match | OVR | HYPE | LTQ | 1X2 |
|---|
| Round of 32 |
Jun 17 09:00 FT Molodechno-DYuSSh 41 Bate Borisov4 | 42%56% | 40%61% | 43%51% | 18.93 X3.79 21.38 |
| Round of 64 |
May 28 11:00 FT DYuSSh-3 Pinsk1 NFK Minsk4 | 47%64% | 35%55% | 59%73% | 1— X— 2— |
May 28 11:00 FT Tekhnolog0 Slonim6 | 38%67% | 25%73% | 50%60% | 1— X— 2— |
May 28 11:00 FT Viktoriya Maryina Horka1 Nadezhda0 | 65%76% | 58%74% | 71%77% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 13:00 FT Urozhaynaya0Molodechno-DYuSSh 43 | 58%59% | 68%72% | 49%47% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 12:00 FT BGU Minsk0 Osipovichy2 | 48%18% | 41%10% | 55%27% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 12:00 FT Neman Mosty1 Niva4 | 41%71% | 33%86% | 49%56% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 11:00 FT Bobovnya0 Bumprom2 | 60%53% | 60%60% | 60%47% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 11:00 FT Krechet0 Ostrovets FC8 | 18%42% | 0%32% | 37%51% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 11:00 FT Polotsk0 Uni Minsk2 | 9%33% | 1%26% | 16%41% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 11:00 FT Shchuchyn3 Lida4 | —— | —— | —— | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 10:30 FT Gazovik1 Volna4 | 46%35% | 33%34% | 60%36% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 10:30 FT Leskhoz0 Shakhter Soligorsk3 | 71%65% | 61%78% | 81%52% | 1— X— 2— |
May 27 10:00 FT Vertical0 Smorgon7 | —— | —— | —— | 1— X— 2— |
May 20 12:00 FT Minskoe More0FC Energetik-Bgu Minsk3 | —— | —— | —— | 1— X— 2— |
May 20 11:00 FT Ivatsevichi1FC Slutsk3 | —— | —— | —— | 1— X— 2— |
May 20 10:30 FT Drut Belynichi0 Orsha7 | —— | —— | —— | 1— X— 2— |
Standings
Round of 32
Molodechno-DYuSSh 4Bate BorisovFC Energetik-Bgu MinskML VitebskFC SlutskDinamo MinskRound of 64
Drut BelynichiOrshaIvatsevichiFC SlutskMinskoe MoreFC Energetik-Bgu MinskVerticalSmorgonGazovikVolnaLeskhozShakhter SoligorskPolotskUni MinskShchuchynLidaKrechetOstrovets FCBobovnyaBumpromBGU MinskOsipovichyNeman MostyNivaUrozhaynayaMolodechno-DYuSSh 4DYuSSh-3 PinskNFK MinskTekhnologSlonimViktoriya Maryina HorkaNadezhdaTrack Coppa 2026 in Belarus with the live league table, the next round of fixtures and the most recent results — and the same advanced-stat columns serious bettors compare side-by-side: points per game (PPG), expected goals (xG), both-teams-to-score percentage, clean-sheet rate, average corners and last-10 form. Every metric recalculates within a few hours of each full-time whistle, so the snapshot you see reflects the most recently completed Coppa round.
About the Coppa 2026 season
Every Coppa 2026 fixture flows into the same dataset behind our Pro Finder and Portal Pulse views — the points, goal difference, xG and last-10 form you see in the table are the exact numbers driving every betting view across the site. Each cell recalculates within a few hours of each full-time whistle, and the matches-played count next to the season badge in the header shows how many Coppa 2026 fixtures have already counted toward the standings — so you can verify the table reflects the latest completed round.
How to read the Coppa standings
Read the table left-to-right: rank, club, matches played (P), wins/draws/losses (W/D/L), goals for and against (GF/GA), goal difference (GD), points and PPG. The Form column shows the last five results as a colored strip (W = green, D = gray, L = red). The advanced block — when available — adds BTTS %, +1.5 %, +2.5 %, clean-sheet %, xGF, xGA and xGD per match, plus average yellow/red cards and corners per fixture. Sort any column by tapping its header.
Form, xG and underperformers
Form, points and xG don't always agree. A team can sit on 1.6 PPG with xG that says 2.1 — the classic xG underperformer profile, where shot quality outpaces finishing. The reverse is also visible: lucky finishing eventually regresses toward xG. The Form column and the xGD column together flag teams whose underlying performance is trending ahead of or behind their actual Coppa 2026 points. Bettors use this gap to find clubs whose odds haven't yet repriced their level
Upcoming fixtures and recent results
Below the table you'll find the next round of Coppa fixtures with each team's pre-match snapshot — last 10 form, PPG, BTTS %, +2.5 %, xG, average corners and the 1×2, over/under 2.5 and BTTS pre-match decimal odds. The Recent Results block above the standings shows the two most-recently completed rounds with the same advanced columns so you can compare what just happened to what's coming
Frequently asked questions
- Which team has the best form in Coppa 2026?
- The Form column on the standings table above shows the last five Coppa 2026 results for every club as a colored WDL strip. Sort the table by PPG (points per game) to see in-form sides over the full Coppa run — anything above 2.0 PPG is dominant-title pace, 1.5–2.0 is upper-table form, 1.0–1.5 is mid-table, and below 1.0 is bottom-of-table form. Exact thresholds vary with the Coppa 2026 match count, so multiply PPG by the season's scheduled matches to project a full-season point total. For a rolling 10-match read instead of season-long, the upcoming-fixtures table below the standings shows each team's last 10 results as a sparkline-style strip alongside their season PPG, so you can spot Coppa sides whose recent run differs sharply from their season average.
- Which Coppa 2026 teams are xG underperformers?
- An xG underperformer is a team whose actual goals scored sit below the goals their shot quality predicts — they're creating chances but not converting. Open the standings advanced block and look at xGF (expected goals for, averaged per match) against the team's actual goal-scoring rate; clubs with high xGF and low actual goals are the underperformers. The reverse profile — high actual goals, low xG — usually regresses. xGD (xG difference, xGF − xGA per match) is the single best summary number: trending positive while points lag means the table understates the side's underlying quality in Coppa 2026.
- How do I find Coppa 2026 away form?
- Away-form splits are surfaced inside each upcoming-match row: the snapshot you see for the away club is computed strictly from that team's away fixtures, so PPG, last 10, BTTS %, +2.5 % and xG values represent away performance only. On the standings page itself the Form column is overall (home plus away combined). When a team's away PPG diverges sharply from their season PPG — common with travel-sensitive clubs — that's a betting signal worth checking against the pre-match 1×2 odds shown in the same row.
- What does PPG mean in the Coppa table?
- PPG is points-per-game — total points divided by matches played, expressed to two decimal places. It's the cleanest comparison metric when teams have played different numbers of matches (postponements, mid-season cup runs, midweek juggling). As a rule of thumb across most leagues: 2.00 PPG is dominant-title pace, 1.50 is upper-table form, 1.30 is mid-table, and 1.00 puts a club in the bottom-table conversation. Multiply PPG by the Coppa 2026 match count to project a season total — useful when comparing clubs with games in hand. PPG is also more stable than raw points across rolling 10-match windows, which is why the upcoming-fixtures table below uses it as the headline pace column.
- How often does Coppa 2026 data refresh?
- Coppa 2026 match results, standings, PPG, xG, BTTS %, clean-sheet % and last-10 form re-aggregate within a few hours after each match completes — refreshed continuously through the matchday but not live. Pre-match odds refresh continuously up to kickoff. The matches-played count next to the season badge in the header shows how many of the scheduled Coppa 2026 fixtures have already counted toward the table, so you can verify the standings reflect the latest completed round at a glance.
- How is the Coppa 2026 expected points vs actual points compared?
- We don't yet show an explicit expected-points column on this table, but you can read the gap from xGD and PPG together. A team whose xGD per match is significantly higher than their points-per-game ratio is over-performing on results (xG says they should be higher, table says they're not — chance creation isn't translating into wins). The Pro Finder view (linked above when available) carries the full xG-vs-points variance breakdown across every Coppa club, flagging the biggest gaps both ways.