1. Division
Unlock Pro Finder stats
ProPremium members get xG, form trends, custom views and full column control on every upcoming match.
- 14-day backtesting
- Unlimited filters
- 80+ stats · 10k+ combos
- Premium sorting
- Custom views
Upcoming Matches
27 matchesRecent Results
18 matches| Match | PPG | OVR | HYPE | LTQ | Last 10 (League) | 1X2 |
|---|
| Round 10 |
Jun 07 10:00 FT Shakhter Soligorsk1 Slonim0 | 1.782.44 | 71%81% | 79%91% | 63%71% | W W | 12.53 X3.10 22.54 |
Jun 07 09:00 FT FC Energetik-Bgu Minsk1 Gomel II1 | 2.221.00 | 78%45% | 88%50% | 67%41% | W L | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 07 08:00 FT FC Slutsk2 Molodechno-DYuSSh 41 | 2.441.78 | 76%65% | 84%78% | 69%52% | W D | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 07 07:00 FT Niva1 Orsha1 | 1.441.25 | 67%42% | 78%44% | 56%40% | L L | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 06 11:00 FT Ostrovets FC0 BATE II0 | 1.110.78 | 56%43% | 59%42% | 54%45% | W L | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 06 10:00 FT Minsk II1 Bumprom1 | 1.001.78 | 48%71% | 49%84% | 47%59% | L W | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 06 09:00 FT Osipovichy0 Smorgon5 | 0.110.44 | 29%42% | 30%44% | 27%39% | L D | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 06 08:00 FT Dinamo Minsk II2 Uni Minsk1 | 1.751.22 | 65%43% | 64%40% | 65%45% | D L | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 06 07:00 FT Lida2 Volna4 | 1.560.89 | 57%52% | 56%61% | 58%43% | D W | 1— X— 2— |
| Round 9 |
Jun 01 11:00 FTMolodechno-DYuSSh 41Dinamo Minsk II1 | 1.881.86 | 67%67% | 81%72% | 52%62% | W D | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 01 11:00 FTVolna1Niva0 | 0.621.62 | 49%74% | 55%91% | 43%56% | L W | 1— X— 2— |
Jun 01 10:00 FTBATE II2Slonim5 | 0.882.38 | 47%70% | 49%75% | 45%64% | D W | 1— X— 2— |
May 31 11:00 FTMinsk II2Shakhter Soligorsk3 | 1.121.62 | 49%68% | 46%80% | 53%56% | W D | 1— X— 2— |
May 31 10:00 FTOstrovets FC3Uni Minsk2 | 0.881.38 | 49%45% | 47%44% | 52%46% | L L | 1— X— 2— |
May 31 09:00 FTBumprom5Osipovichy1 | 1.620.12 | 60%30% | 69%32% | 52%29% | W L | 1— X— 2— |
May 31 08:00 FTSmorgon4Lida4 | 0.381.62 | 40%53% | 38%50% | 42%56% | L L | 1— X— 2— |
May 31 06:00 FTGomel II1FC Slutsk3 | 1.122.38 | 49%68% | 58%69% | 41%67% | D W | 1— X— 2— |
May 30 08:00 FTOrsha0FC Energetik-Bgu Minsk2 | 1.432.12 | 51%77% | 63%87% | 39%66% | L W | 1— X— 2— |
Standings
| Form | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 FC Slutsk | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 13 | +12 | 25 | 2.50 | WWLDW |
2 Slonim | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 6 | +13 | 22 | 2.20 | WWLWW |
3 FC Energetik-Bgu Minsk | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 8 | +12 | 21 | 2.10 | WWWLW |
4 Shakhter Soligorsk | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 22 | 7 | +15 | 19 | 1.90 | WDWWL |
5 Dinamo Minsk II | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 12 | +9 | 17 | 1.89 | DDWWL |
6 Bumprom | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 12 | +7 | 17 | 1.70 | WWLWL |
7 Molodechno-DYuSSh 4 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 16 | 1.60 | DWWWL |
8 Niva | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 14 | +3 | 14 | 1.40 | LWWWW |
9 Lida | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 20 | -3 | 14 | 1.40 | DLLWW |
10 Ostrovets FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 1.10 | WLDLD |
11 Volna | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 11 | 1.10 | WLWLD |
12 Uni Minsk | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 11 | 1.10 | LLDLW |
13 Orsha | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 11 | 1.22 | LLWLW |
14 Gomel II | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 10 | 1.00 | LDDLL |
15 Minsk II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 23 | -13 | 10 | 1.00 | LWWLL |
16 BATE II | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 8 | 0.80 | LDDLW |
17 Smorgon | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 7 | 0.70 | DLLDL |
18 Osipovichy | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 33 | -24 | 1 | 0.10 | LLLLL |
Want detailed market stats?
xG, BTTS %, +2.5 %, clean-sheet %, cards and corners — per team, per match.
Track 1. Division 2026 in Belarus with the live league table, the next round of fixtures and the most recent results — and the same advanced-stat columns serious bettors compare side-by-side: points per game (PPG), expected goals (xG), both-teams-to-score percentage, clean-sheet rate, average corners and last-10 form. Every metric recalculates within a few hours of each full-time whistle, so the snapshot you see reflects the most recently completed 1. Division round.
About the 1. Division 2026 season
Every 1. Division 2026 fixture flows into the same dataset behind our Pro Finder and Portal Pulse views — the points, goal difference, xG and last-10 form you see in the table are the exact numbers driving every betting view across the site. Each cell recalculates within a few hours of each full-time whistle, and the matches-played count next to the season badge in the header shows how many 1. Division 2026 fixtures have already counted toward the standings — so you can verify the table reflects the latest completed round.
How to read the 1. Division standings
Read the table left-to-right: rank, club, matches played (P), wins/draws/losses (W/D/L), goals for and against (GF/GA), goal difference (GD), points and PPG. The Form column shows the last five results as a coloured strip (W = green, D = grey, L = red). The advanced block — when available — adds BTTS %, +1.5 %, +2.5 %, clean-sheet %, xGF, xGA and xGD per match, plus average yellow/red cards and corners per fixture. Sort any column by tapping its header.
Form, xG and underperformers
Form, points and xG don't always agree. A team can sit on 1.6 PPG with xG that says 2.1 — the classic xG underperformer profile, where shot quality outpaces finishing. The reverse is also visible: lucky finishing eventually regresses toward xG. The Form column and the xGD column together flag teams whose underlying performance is trending ahead of or behind their actual 1. Division 2026 points. Bettors use this gap to find clubs whose odds haven't yet repriced their level
Upcoming fixtures and recent results
Below the table you'll find the next round of 1. Division fixtures with each team's pre-match snapshot — last 10 form, PPG, BTTS %, +2.5 %, xG, average corners and the 1×2, over/under 2.5 and BTTS pre-match decimal odds. The Recent Results block above the standings shows the two most-recently completed rounds with the same advanced columns so you can compare what just happened to what's coming
Frequently asked questions
- Which team has the best form in 1. Division 2026?
- The Form column on the standings table above shows the last five 1. Division 2026 results for every club as a coloured WDL strip. Sort the table by PPG (points per game) to see in-form sides over the full 1. Division run — anything above 2.0 PPG is dominant-title pace, 1.5–2.0 is upper-table form, 1.0–1.5 is mid-table, and below 1.0 is bottom-of-table form. Exact thresholds vary with the 1. Division 2026 match count, so multiply PPG by the season's scheduled matches to project a full-season point total. For a rolling 10-match read instead of season-long, the upcoming-fixtures table below the standings shows each team's last 10 results as a sparkline-style strip alongside their season PPG, so you can spot 1. Division sides whose recent run differs sharply from their season average.
- Which 1. Division 2026 teams are xG underperformers?
- An xG underperformer is a team whose actual goals scored sit below the goals their shot quality predicts — they're creating chances but not converting. Open the standings advanced block and look at xGF (expected goals for, averaged per match) against the team's actual goal-scoring rate; clubs with high xGF and low actual goals are the underperformers. The reverse profile — high actual goals, low xG — usually regresses. xGD (xG difference, xGF − xGA per match) is the single best summary number: trending positive while points lag means the table understates the side's underlying quality in 1. Division 2026.
- How do I find 1. Division 2026 away form?
- Away-form splits are surfaced inside each upcoming-match row: the snapshot you see for the away club is computed strictly from that team's away fixtures, so PPG, last 10, BTTS %, +2.5 % and xG values represent away performance only. On the standings page itself the Form column is overall (home plus away combined). When a team's away PPG diverges sharply from their season PPG — common with travel-sensitive clubs — that's a betting signal worth checking against the pre-match 1×2 odds shown in the same row.
- What does PPG mean in the 1. Division table?
- PPG is points-per-game — total points divided by matches played, expressed to two decimal places. It's the cleanest comparison metric when teams have played different numbers of matches (postponements, mid-season cup runs, midweek juggling). As a rule of thumb across most leagues: 2.00 PPG is dominant-title pace, 1.50 is upper-table form, 1.30 is mid-table, and 1.00 puts a club in the bottom-table conversation. Multiply PPG by the 1. Division 2026 match count to project a season total — useful when comparing clubs with games in hand. PPG is also more stable than raw points across rolling 10-match windows, which is why the upcoming-fixtures table below uses it as the headline pace column.
- How often does 1. Division 2026 data refresh?
- 1. Division 2026 match results, standings, PPG, xG, BTTS %, clean-sheet % and last-10 form re-aggregate within a few hours after each match completes — refreshed continuously through the matchday but not live. Pre-match odds refresh continuously up to kickoff. The matches-played count next to the season badge in the header shows how many of the scheduled 1. Division 2026 fixtures have already counted toward the table, so you can verify the standings reflect the latest completed round at a glance.
- How is the 1. Division 2026 expected points vs actual points compared?
- We don't yet show an explicit expected-points column on this table, but you can read the gap from xGD and PPG together. A team whose xGD per match is significantly higher than their points-per-game ratio is over-performing on results (xG says they should be higher, table says they're not — chance creation isn't translating into wins). The Pro Finder view (linked above when available) carries the full xG-vs-points variance breakdown across every 1. Division club, flagging the biggest gaps both ways.